MDgreencard.com Newsletter
Volume II, Number III
November
15, 2003
This newsletter,
edited by Theodore Sherman, Esq., and published strictly
in an electronic format, contains information pertinent to
immigration issues for physicians and scientists who desire
to reside in the U.S. on a temporary or permanent basis.
Readers
who wish to obtain more information on topics are encouraged
to forward your queries to us by completing the online consultation
form on our website. We will respond to your particular queries
as soon as possible. Also, please don't hesitate to contact
the author directly if you wish, as I do attempt to answer
all emails personally within just a few days of my receipt.
New
Feature. We have recently added a chat room feature
to our website. Starting soon, I will be hosting a monthly
chat room whereby you can discuss your questions and issues
with me in real time. This chat capability will also allow
you to interact with other physicians and scientists on
a variety of immigration related topics.
Current
Immigration Climate in U.S.: Very difficult, with immigration
processing delays increasing substantially in nearly every
US immigration category due to increased scrutiny. It is
now not unusual for Green Card processing to require 3-4+
years for completion.
Table
of Contents
Topics for Physicians / Scientists
1.1
H-1B Visa quota may be reached in early 2004 –actions
to take now
The annual
quota (cap) of H-1B visas decreased on October 1, 2003, from
195,000 down to 65,000. Therefore, for the fiscal year extending
from October 1, 2003 to September 30, 2004, only 65,000 H-1B
visas will be issued. Since during the past few years, many
more than 65,000 H-1Bs were issued, we expect that the now
reduced cap will be reached sometime between February and
March 2004. Physicians and scientists contemplating obtaining
an H-1B visa should consider taking certain steps in the
very near future to avoid the likely unavailability of these
visas early next year.
The Cap
does not apply to every situation. Please note that the cap
does not apply to the following situations:
(a) individuals
currently on H-1B visa, who are applying for renewal or transfer
based on a new employer;
(b) individuals with job offers from universities and non-profit
research/clinical organizations; and
(c) certain physicians who obtained J1 waivers.
The Cap
may negatively impact physicians seeking H-1B visas to begin
residencies/fellowships in July 2003, By the time the match
occurs in March 2004, the H-1B cap may have already been
reached. For physicians who have matched with hospitals which
are non-profit AND which are affiliated with an institution
of higher education (i.e. a medical school), the cap does
not apply. However, the cap does apply to matched positions
with for-profit and other hospitals which are not affiliated
with universities. Unless the physician is certain that he/she
will match with an ‘exempt from the cap’ hospital,
certain steps should be taken now to provide the highest
likelihood of being able to obtain H1B visa for graduate
medical training.
(a) individuals
on F1 practical training should apply for change of status
to H1B now, even though the practical training status may
be valid for a number of additional months – once on
H1B status, applying for a H1B ‘transfer’ to
begin residency/fellowship training will not be subject to
the cap;
9b) apply for H1B visa for a medical research position now, sponsored
by a physician group/research organization, for reasons as noted
above;
(c) be sure to utilize premium processing (extra $ 1000 filing
fee) to guarantee a 15 day response from the immigration service,
as H1B visas filed under normal processing may require 6 months
for adjudication, and the cap could be reached while the application
remains in progress.
If
you have concerns that your situation may place you at
risk of missing the cap, be sure to contact me by email (info@MDgreencard.com) or
phone (248-539-5300). I would be pleased to consult with
you on this important issue.
(
** Please note that there is some talk in the U.S. Congress
to increase the cap to 100,000 or so – stay tuned
for more information **)
1.2
HHS J-1 Waivers – suspended at the moment
The US
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has suspended
the J-1 shortage-area waiver program temporarily, because
the policy is under review. Effective from October 1, 2003
the HHS stopped accepting applications.
Well,
as noted in the hot-topics and earlier editions of this newsletter,
the HHS J-1 waiver program was quite flawed anyway – we
pursued this option for just a very small percentage of our
clients seeking J-1 waivers through employment in underserved
areas.
The great
majority of our J-1 waiver clients have instead had excellent
success with the Conrad 30 route.
As to
a possible date to reinstate the HHS program, stay tuned.
1.3
Unlawful presence in the U.S. – understanding the
3 and 10-year bars
We have
received a number of inquiries lately concerning the misunderstood
3 and 10-year bars on re-entry for individuals who overstay
the validity of their temporary visas in the U.S. The applicable
law states that individuals who are ‘unlawfully’ present
in the U.S. for more than 180 days are inadmissible back
to U.S. (once he/she has departed) for a period of 3-years.
For ‘unlawfully’ present individuals for more
than one year, there is a bar of 10-years for admission back
to the U.S.
The law
specifically excludes certain time periods as not counting
toward unlawful presence as follows:
(a) periods
whereby the individual is under 18 years of age;
(b) periods during which the individual has a pending application
for asylum;
(c) periods whereby the individual has Family Unity status;
(d) periods in which the individual is in violation of status
due to abuse by a U.S. citizen or permanent resident spouse;
(e) periods whereby the individual has an application pending
for adjustment of status to lawful permanent residence so long
as the application was filed prior to the individual’s
visa expiration; and
(f) periods whereby the individual has applied for change or
extension of stay, whereby the application is pending.
*
Please note that individuals admitted to the U.S. with I-94s
valid for the duration of their stay (D/S) such as F1 students,
J1 exchange visitors and others, unlawful presence does not
accrue until the Immigration Service has determined a visa
violation or an Immigration Judge has made a determination
that the individual has violated his/her status.
1.4
Applying for Canadian Immigration as a back-up – something
to think about
A good
number of our clients request information on Canadian immigration,
as a back-up, due to the increasing delays and toughening
regulations in the U.S. immigration process. Canada does
indeed have easier immigration regulations and policies than
those in the U.S., and for some individuals may indeed be
the right choice to consider either as a temporary or permanent
measure, if needed.
For more
information on Canada immigration, please visit the following
weblink (which is the official website of the Canadian immigration
service):
http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/skilled/qual-1.html
With the
above said, working in Canada as a physician may not be as
easy as obtaining permanent residence status there, as Canada
does have unusual laws in this area. Please email or call
my office with further questions in this regard.
1.5
J1 (Hardship) Waiver Update – more approvals
Hardship
waivers are continuing to be possibilities for those individuals
who can set forth hardships their U.S. citizens children
or spouses will face if the two-year home residency requirement
is imposed.
A few
of our latest hardship waiver approvals involved the following
situations:
(a) a
Lebanese physician, with young U.S. citizen children, who
no longer maintained any ties to Lebanon; hardship was shown
by detailing the dangers American children would be faced
in Lebanon, coupled with the deteriorating infrastructure
of the country that have resulted in substandard education
and healthcare, furthering putting the lives of the American
children at risk;
(b) a Filipino physician, with an autistic U.S. citizen child;
hardship was shown by detailing the child’s autistic condition
and intense therapy the child was receiving in the U.S., and
submitting expert testimony that autistic children need stability/continuity
and that any move would cause regression of the child’s
condition; and
(c) An Indian physician married to an American citizen currently
enrolled in a Master’s program in the US; hardship was
shown by detailing the emotional hardship the newly married couple
would face by separating for a two-year period as well as the
American spouse’s hardship she would face by quitting her
studies and relocating to India.
Based
on our continued success in this area, we recommend that
you consult our staff concerning your likelihood of obtaining
J1 waiver based on exceptional hardship if you have a U.S.
citizen spouse or American born child.
1.6
Interesting Facts/Statistics Concerning US Immigration
a.
The United States (1930 versus the present)
How
the U.S. Has Changed Since the 1930 Census
|
| |
1930
|
2000
|
| Total
U.S. Population |
122.8
million
|
281.4
million
|
| Leading
country of birth of foreign born |
Italy
(1.8 million)
|
Mexico
(7.8 million)
|
| Life
expectancy |
59.7
years
|
77.1
years
|
| Median
age |
26.5
years
|
35.3
years
|
| Population
of California |
5.7
million
|
33.9
million
|
| Number
of people age 65 and over |
6.6
million
|
35.0
million
|
| Proportion
of women in the labor force |
24%
|
61%
|
| Percentage
of households consisting of people living alone |
8%
|
26%
|
| Average
number of people per household |
4.1
|
2.6
|
Source: U.S. Census Data
b.
Physician Demographics
The Top
20 States Ranked by Total Number of IMGs (% of IMG population):
| 1.
New York |
27,035
|
(40.1%)
|
| 2.
California |
19,825
|
(22.1%)
|
| 3.
Florida |
14,661
|
(33.2%)
|
| 4.
Illinois |
10,761
|
(33.3%)
|
| 5.
New Jersey |
10,733
|
(40.1%)
|
| 6.
Texas |
9,703
|
(22.1%)
|
| 7.
Pennsylvania |
7,927
|
(20.6%)
|
| 8.
Ohio |
7,304
|
(28.5%)
|
| 9.
Michigan |
6,752
|
(26.9%)
|
| 10.
Maryland |
5,646
|
(27.3%)
|
| 11.
Massachusetts |
5,324
|
(28.6%)
|
| 12.
Virginia |
3,794
|
(13.0%)
|
| 13.
Connecticut |
3,061
|
(21.6%)
|
| 14.
Georgia |
2,981
|
(15.3%)
|
| 15.
Missouri |
2,551
|
(18.6%)
|
| 16.
Indiana |
2,435
|
(27.5%)
|
| 17.
North Carolina |
2,238
|
(19.1%)
|
| 18.
Wisconsin |
2,076
|
(11.6%)
|
| 19.
Tennessee |
2,024
|
(22.5%)
|
| 20.
Arizona |
1,874
|
(15.5%)
|
TOP 20 STATES RANKED BY % of IMGs
| 1.
New York |
40.1%
|
| 2.
New Jersey |
40.1%
|
| 3.
Illinois |
33.3%
|
| 4.
Florida |
33.2%
|
| 5.
Massachusetts |
28.6%
|
| 6.
Ohio |
28.5%
|
| 7.
Indiana |
27.5%
|
| 8.
Maryland |
27.3%
|
| 9.
Michigan |
26.9%
|
| 10.
Tennessee |
22.5%
|
| 11.
California |
22.1%
|
| 12.
Texas |
22.1%
|
| 13.
Connecticut |
21.6%
|
| 14.
Pennsylvania |
20.6%
|
| 15.
North Carolina |
19.1%
|
| 16.
Missouri |
18.6%
|
| 17.
Arizona |
15.5%
|
| 18.
Georgia |
15.3%
|
| 19.
Kentucky |
13.3%
|
| 20.
Virginia |
13.0%
|
Source: AMA
We appreciate
your comments. Please direct your emails to us at info@MDgreencard.com
Please
continue to visit our website at www.MDgreencard.com for
information on our new chat room feature which will be functional
soon.
|