MDgreencard.com Newsletter
Volume II, Number I
March
1, 2003
This newsletter,
edited by Theodore Sherman, Esq., and published strictly
in an electronic format, contains information pertinent to
immigration issues for physicians and scientists who desire
to reside in the U.S. on a temporary or permanent basis.
Readers
who wish to obtain more information on topics are encouraged
to forward your queries to us by completing the online consultation
form on our website. We will respond to your particular queries
as soon as possible.
Improved
Website design for MDgreencard.com - In January 2003,
we significantly improved the design and contents of our
website. If you have not visited our site for a few months,
please take a moment to access our newly designed site,
and let us know what you think. Our web designers, C2G
Media (www.c2gmedia.com), have been instrumental in assisting
in creating the new look and feel of our site. For those
of you who have interest in creating or improving your
own site, I highly recommend that you contact these folks
- just tell them that Ted recommended you, and I'm sure
that Chris and Ellie would be most happy to work with you.
Current
Immigration Climate in US: Difficult, with INS processing
delays increasing substantially in nearly every US immigration
category due to increased security checks. For example,
it is not unusual for I-140 (immigrant) petitions to require
240+ days for processing at all of the INS Service Centers.
Table
of Contents
Topics for Physicians / Scientists
1.1
Tougher US Immigration Policies for Canadian Landed Immigrants
Effective
March 17, 2003, all landed immigrants of Canada will have
to present a valid passport and visa to enter the United
States. Canadian citizens will continue to be exempt from
the passport/visa requirement.
In a
major shift in US immigration policy toward permanent residents
(landed immigrants) of Canada, these individuals no longer
are exempt from the passport/visa requirement to enter
the US Previously, nationals of 54 countries who had were
considered to 'share a common nationality with British'
were not required to previously have obtained a visa to
the US prior to arriving at a US port of entry. Instead,
individuals who were national of the countries listed below,
were required only to establish their eligibility for entry
to the US upon arrival. These countries are:
| |
Antigua
and Barbuda, Australia, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belize,
Botswana, Brunei Darussalam, Cameroon, Cyprus, Dominica,
Fiji Islands, Ghana, Grenada, Guyana, India, Jamaica,
Kenya, Kiribati, Lesotho, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives,
Malta, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, Nauru, New Zealand,
Nigeria, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Seychelles,
Sierra Leone, Singapore, Solomon Islands, South Africa,
Sri Lanka, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia, St. Vincent
and the Grenadines, Swaziland, The Bahamas, The Gambia,
Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Tuvalu, Uganda, United
Kingdom, United Republic of Tanzania, Vanuatu, Zambia,
and Zimbabwe. |
|
Prior
to the enactment of this new law, thousands of individuals
who were nationals of the above countries first immigrated
to Canada (due to its much easier immigration requirements).
Immediately upon entering Canada as landed immigrants (permanent
residents), these individuals would be allowed to enter
the US without the need to formally apply for a visa at
a US Consulate or Embassy abroad. No longer.
With
the new regulations, the US government is taking further
steps to prevent anyone from entering the US (with the
exception of Canadian citizens) without first being prescreened
by US Consulate/Embassy officials. These steps are being
taken directly as a result of heightened border security
concerns following the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist acts.
Under the new regulations, nationals of the 54 countries who
reside in Canada will now need to apply for and obtain nonimmigrant
visas from a US Consulate to enter the United States, unless
they are entering for less than 90 days as short-term visitors
for business (B-1) or pleasure (B-2) and are eligible to enter
under the Visa Waiver Program (Visa Waiver Program countries
include: Andorra, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brunei, Denmark,
Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Liechtenstein,
Luxembourg, Monaco, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal,
San Marino, Singapore, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland,
the United Kingdom, and Uruguay).
This
new policy is expected to result in an increase the number
of visa applications at US Consulates in Canada by more
than 100,000 in the first year alone. The queue for visa
issuance at these Consulates is expected to increased drastically.
1.2
Update on Special Registration
Since our
last newsletter, the special registration program of the
INS has been increased to include nationals of some 25 countries
who are residing in the US The countries were divided into
groups as noted below.
First
Group
- Registration
deadline: December 16, 2002
- Iraq,
Iran, Libya, Sudan and Syria
Second
Group
- Registration
deadline: January 10, 2003
- Afghanistan,
Algeria, Bahrain, Eritrea, Lebanon, Morocco, North Korea,
Oman, Qatar, Somalia, Tunisia, the United Arab Emirates
and Yemen
Third
Group
- Registration
deadline: February 21, 2003
- Saudi
Arabia and Pakistan
Fourth
Group
- Registration
deadline: March 28, 2003
- Bangladesh,
Indonesia, Egypt, Jordan and Kuwait
(please
note that the above deadlines for registration are subject
to change by the INS)
About
350 of our physician/scientist clients met the criteria and
have been required to register so far. Fortunately, none
have been unduly hassled or questioned upon registration.
The INS did, however, request detailed personal information
from a few of our clients (bank account numbers, credit card
numbers, mortgage information, etc.), and one of our clients
had his passport temporarily seized due to the similarity
of his name with that of a wanted terrorist (our Nephrologist
client was a bit unnerved by the experience, but nonetheless
pleased that the INS was able to clear his name within a
few days).
So, all
in all, special registration has not created undue hardships
for our physician/scientist clients. Earlier worries about
potential undue detention and harassment seem now to be unfounded.
1.3
The E Visa - A potential option for certain physicians
previously on J1 visa
First,
a bit of a primer on the E visa. Over the years the United
States has signed treaties with many countries in the world,
in particular treaties of 'Friendship, Commerce and Navigation'.
These treaties are designed to promote trade and investment
between the USA and the other contracting state, thereby
encouraging good relations. Nationals of countries with such
treaties with the US are often eligible to obtain visas in
order to develop and/or direct their investment in and/or
trade with the US These visas are called E visas, and are
divided into two sub-classifications: E1 (treaty trader)
and E2 (treaty investor).
E1 (Treaty
Trader). Nationals of qualifying treaty countries who undertake
a substantial amount of international trade with the US may
qualify for this type of visa. The following countries have
treaties with the United States that allow qualifying nationals
to apply for Treaty Trader status:-
| Argentina |
China
(ROC) |
France |
Italy |
Netherlands |
Sweden |
| Australia |
Colombia |
Germany |
Japan |
Norway |
Switzerland |
| Austria |
Costa
Rica |
Greece |
Korea |
Oman |
Thailand |
| Belgium |
Denmark |
Honduras |
Latvia |
Pakistan |
Togo |
| Bolivia |
Estonia |
Iran |
Liberia |
Philippines |
Turkey |
| Brunei |
Ethiopia |
Ireland |
Lux'bourg |
Spain |
U.K. |
| Canada |
Finland |
Israel |
Mexico |
Suriname |
Yugoslavia |
E2 (Treaty
Investor). Nationals of qualifying treaty countries who have
made a significant investment in the United States may qualify
for the E2 treaty investor status. E2 visas may only be applied
for by people or companies from the following countries:
| Argentina |
China
(ROC) |
Georgia |
Kyrgyzstan |
Pakistan |
Switzerland |
| Armenia |
Colombia |
Germany |
Latvia |
Panama |
Thailand |
| Australia |
Congo |
Grenada |
Liberia |
Philippines |
Togo |
| Austria |
Costa
Rica |
Honduras |
Luxembourg |
Poland |
Trinidad
and Tobago |
| Bangladesh |
The
Czech Republic |
Iran |
Mexico |
Romania |
Tunisia |
| Belarus |
Ecuador |
Ireland |
Morocco |
Senegal |
Turkey |
| Belgium |
Egypt |
Italy |
Moldovia |
The
Slovak Republic |
The
Ukraine |
| Bosnia-Herzegovina |
Estonia |
Jamaica |
Mongolia |
Spain |
United
Kingdom |
| Bulgaria |
Ethiopia |
Japan |
Netherlands |
Sri
Lanka |
Uzbekistan |
| Cameroon |
Finland |
Kazakhstan |
Norway |
Suriname |
Yugoslavia |
| Canada |
France |
Korea |
Oman |
Sweden |
|
Both the
E1 and E2 visas have particular documentary requirements
that must be met in order to qualify for visa issuance.
Lately,
we have been increasingly successful in obtaining E visa
approval for our physician clients who are nationals of the
countries listed above who incorporate their own medical
practice, and then contract their services to hospitals or
other medical groups in the USThis visa option is particularly
attractive to individuals who have held the J1 visa in the
past and who are not eligible for the H1B visa, since they
have not yet satisfied or obtained a waiver of the two-year
home residency requirement.
Due to
the complexities of the process involved in securing E visa
approval, please contact me by email or phone so that I may
determine if your situation warrants E visa consideration.
1.4
Options to Consider when your J1 visa is about to expire
Due to
increasing delays in J1 waiver processing, some of our clients
are beginning to find themselves in situations whereby their
stay on J1 visa is about to expire and are not yet eligible
to obtain the H-1B visa since their waiver has not yet been
given final approval by the INS. Even though J1 visa holders
are given a 30 day grace period beyond the conclusion of
their program/training in which to leave the country or change
to another visa status, delays in waiver processing nearly
always exceed this 30 day grace period.
The danger
in overstaying beyond the 30-day grace period should not
be minimized, for overstays of more than 180 days lead to
three-year bar to reentry to the US, while overstays of more
than 360 days lead to a 10 year bar. Hence, the physician/scientist
should be very careful in considering the following options
when it appears that he/she will fall into the situation
as set forth in the first paragraph.
Here are
some options.
(1) Consider
obtaining a J1 extension, especially for physicians
who are eligible to sit for a Board medical examination.
Usually, the request for extension and issuance of an
corresponding IAP=66 form for the few month period leading
up to the Board exam will not be denied even if the physician
has applied for a J1 waiver, unless the waiver has already
been approved.
(2) Consider
obtaining an O or E visa, since O and E visa
applicants need not have fulfilled or obtained a waiver
of the two-year home residency requirement.
(3) Depart
the US and wait until your waiver has been approved, since
you can reenter the US on H-1B visa upon waiver approval,
and subsequent H visa approval by the INS.
(4) Apply
for the H-1B visa prior to final approval of your J1
waiver application, and therefore be able to
remain in the US pending adjudication of your H-1B petition.
So long as the H-1B application is filed prior to the
expiration of your J1 visa as shown on your IAP-66 form,
you are legally able to remain in the US during the period
in which your H-1B visa is being adjudicated. Due to
requirement that you not have any break in employment,
I strongly recommend that you contact me directly to
discuss in this option may apply to you.
1.5
J1 (Hardship) Waiver Update - the effect of increased tensions
in the Middle East/Iraq
Due to
heightened tensions with Iraq and other Muslim countries,
the US State Department has issued a number of additional
travel warnings for American citizens urging them to stay
away from several Muslim countries. Travel warnings now exist
for the following list of countries:
For physicians/scientists
from any of these countries who have US citizen spouses and/or
children, the hardship waiver is an option for J1 waiver
that should be seriously considered. Based on our experiences
with the INS and US State Department, we have found that
both agencies are much more likely to act favorably on hardship
waiver applications when a travel warning is in place.
A war
in Iraq will undoubtedly result in the issuance of additional
travel warnings for additional countries. For the a list
of the latest travel warnings issued by the US Dept. of State,
visit the following website:
http://www.travel.state.gov/travel_warnings.html
1.6
Interesting Facts/Statistics Concerning US Immigration
(1) Total
immigration to the US in the decade beginning in 1820 is
set forth in the table below.
|
Period
|
|
Total
Immigration
|
|
1821-30
|
|
143,439
|
|
1831-40
|
|
599,125
|
|
1841-50
|
|
1,713,251
|
|
1851-60
|
|
2,598,214
|
|
1861-70
|
|
2,314,824
|
|
1871-80
|
|
2,812,191
|
|
1881-90
|
|
5,246,613
|
|
1891-00
|
|
3,687,564
|
|
1901-10
|
|
8,795,386
|
|
1911-20
|
|
5,735,811
|
|
1921-30
|
|
4,107,209
|
|
1931-40
|
|
528,431
|
|
1941-50
|
|
1,035,039
|
|
1951-60
|
|
2,515,479
|
|
1961-70
|
|
3,321,677
|
|
1971-80
|
|
4,493,314
|
|
1981-90
|
|
7,338,062
|
|
1991-97
|
|
6,944,591
|
In viewing
the above data, please note that the US population in 1820
was just over 9 million. In the latest census, the US population
is now approximately 290 million.
Source: Statistical
Yearbook of the Immigration and Naturalization Service for
1994 and updated for 1997 data.
2. Other
interesting facts/statistics
The 1850
decennial census was the first census in which data were
collected on the nativity of the population. From 1850 to
1930, the foreign-born population of the United States increased
from 2.2 million to 14.2 million, reflecting large-scale
immigration from Europe during most of this period. As a
percentage of total population, the foreign-born population
rose from 9.7 percent in 1850 and fluctuated in the 13 percent
to 15 percent range from 1860 to 1920 before dropping to
11.6 percent in 1930. The highest percentages foreign born
were 14.4 percent in 1870, 14.8 percent in 1890 and 14.7
percent in 1910.
From 1930
to 1950, the foreign-born population of the United States
declined from 14.2 million to 10.3 million, or from 11.6
percent to 6.9 percent of the total population. These declines
reflected the extremely low level of immigration during the
1930s and 1940s. The foreign-born population then dropped
slowly to 9.6 million in 1970, when it represented a record
low 4.7 percent of the total population. Immigration had
risen during the 1950s and 1960s, but was still low by historical
standards, and mortality was high during this period among
the foreign-born population because of its old age structure
(reflecting four decades of low immigration).
Since
1970, the foreign-born population of the United States has
increased rapidly due to large-scale immigration, primarily
from Latin America and Asia. The foreign-born population
rose from 9.6 million in 1970 to 14.1 million in 1980 and
to 19.8 million in 1990. The estimated foreign-born population
in 1997 was 25.8 million. As a percentage of the total population,
the foreign-born population increased from 4.7 percent in
1970 to 6.2 percent in 1980, to 7.9 percent in 1990, and
to an estimated 9.7 percent in 1997.2
Source: US
Census 2000.
|